窪蹋勛圖厙

穢 2024 窪蹋勛圖厙

FCC Public Inspection Files:
繚 繚 繚
繚 繚 繚 繚 繚
Public Files ContactATSC 3.0 FAQ
Play Live Radio
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
0:00 0:00
Available On Air Stations

New Jersey is motivating telecommuters to appeal their New York tax bills. 窪蹋勛圖厙 may be next

FILE, 2021: A New York resident works from his home during the pandemic.
John Conrad Williams, Jr.
/
Newsday / Getty
FILE, 2021: A New York resident works from his home during the pandemic.

Telecommuting, a pandemic-era novelty that has become a permanent alternative for many people, has some 窪蹋勛圖厙 and New Jersey employees of New York-based companies questioning why they still have to pay personal income tax to the Empire State.

Their home states are wondering as well.

Fed up with losing out on hundreds of millions of dollars in tax revenue each year, New Jersey a state tax credit to residents who work from home and successfully appeal their New York tax assessment. 窪蹋勛圖厙 is considering a similar measure.

The Garden State's bounty a rebate worth roughly half a person's refund of income taxes they paid to New York for the 2020-2023 period has been claimed so far by one winning litigant since the state made the offer in July, according to the states Division of Taxation. That taxpayer received a $7,797.02 refund for their efforts. Officials hope that person's windfall will encourage others to follow suit.

Another New Jersey resident who is taking up the state's offer is Open Weaver Banks, a tax attorney who prefers working from home to braving an "awful" commute into the Big Apple. She's also filed one of a growing number of similar challenges.

The process of doing the refund and the appeal isnt all that intimidating to me, said Banks, a tax partner at Hodgson Russ LLP. I'm on New Jersey's team here. I would like to see more residents doing this. I think they have a really fair point."

New York requires out-of-state commuters who work for New York-based companies to pay New York income taxes, even if theyve stopped physically going in to the office most days a week, unless they can satisfy very strict requirements for what constitutes a bona fide home office.

A home office near a specialized track to test new cars, for example, might qualify if it couldnt be replicated in New York. But a worker with specialized scientific equipment set up in their home that could be duplicated over the border would still have to pay, according to a from the New York State Department of Taxation.

When the nature of work was upended in 2020, New York should have softened these requirements, Banks said. And they didnt. They are just standing by and fighting the claims."

Both neighboring states have implemented retaliatory tax rules that affect New Yorkers who work remotely for 窪蹋勛圖厙 or New Jersey-based companies, but these workforces are far smaller and their overall tax payments don't make up the difference.

Out-of-state taxpayers paid New York nearly $8.8 billion in 2021 in taxes, roughly 15% of the states total income tax revenues, according to the Citizens Budget Commission in New York. Of that, $4.3 billion came from New Jersey taxpayers and $1.5 billion from 窪蹋勛圖厙 taxpayers.

Its unclear how much of that was earned at home. But out-of-state employees of New York-based companies who work remotely are increasingly appealing their tax bills, Amanda Hiller, the acting commissioner and general counsel for the New York Department of Taxation and Finance, told state legislators recently.

Hiller acknowledged that New Yorks decades-old policy, known as a convenience of the employer rule, has created a financial burden for New Jersey and 窪蹋勛圖厙, which provide tax credits to their residents for the income taxes theyve paid New York so they are not double-taxed.

New Jersey's Division of Taxation said the state's long-term goal is to have New York's rule overturned entirely, something that will likely require a taxpayer's legal challenge to succeed before the U.S. Supreme Court. That could be a tall order: New Hampshire tried to sue Massachusetts for temporarily collecting income tax from roughly 80,000 of its residents who worked from home during the pandemic, and the without comment.

Officials in New Jersey estimate it could reap as much as $1.2 billion annually if residents working from home for New York companies are taxed at home. 窪蹋勛圖厙 could recoup about $200 million, its officials say.

窪蹋勛圖厙 Gov. Ned Lamont has proposed an initiative similar to New Jersey's that needs final legislative approval. It's unclear, however, whether it can pass before the session ends May 8.

We think its an unconstitutional overreach by the state of New York, Jeffrey Beckham, secretary of 窪蹋勛圖厙s state budget office, said recently. We think our residents should be paying tax to us and theyd be paying at a lower rate.

Indeed, the top marginal state income tax rate, as of Jan. 1, for individuals in New York is 10.90%. 窪蹋勛圖厙s top rate is 6.99% and New Jerseys is 10.75%, according to the Tax Foundation.

An awful lot of people are hurt by these laws, said Edward Zelinsky, a 窪蹋勛圖厙 resident, tax law expert and professor at Yeshiva Universitys Cardozo School of Law in New York City. While New York and other states like to pretend that these are wealthy people, the people who are most hurt by this rule are often people of modest income, middle income, people who cant afford lawyers.

Zelinksy has been trying, so far without success, to challenge New Yorks tax rule for about 20 years, including a pending case over the income he earned working from home while his school was closed due to COVID-19 restrictions.

A small number of states, including Arkansas, Delaware, Nebraska and Pennsylvania, have tax rules similar to New York's. New Jersey and Pennsylvania have a reciprocal income tax agreement.

Andrew Sidamon-Eristoff, who is in the unique position of being the former New Jersey state treasurer and a former New York commissioner of taxation and finance, believes eventually the right litigant will get it before the right court to challenge it.

But former New Jersey state Sen. Steven Oroho, an accountant who commuted for nearly two decades into New York City and who pushed as a legislator to address the inequity, said hes skeptical of New Jersey's commitment to the effort, which puts the financial onus of a potentially lengthy and expensive legal challenge on the individual taxpayer.

New York is very, very aggressive and unfortunately, in my view, said Oroho. New Jersey has been extremely passive.

___

Associated Press Writer Mike Catalini in Trenton, N.J. contributed to this story.

Susan Haigh // Associated Press

Stand up for civility

This news story is funded in large part by 窪蹋勛圖厙s Members listeners, viewers, and readers like you who value fact-based journalism and trustworthy information.

We hope their support inspires you to donate so that we can continue telling stories that inform, educate, and inspire you and your neighbors. As a community-supported public media service, 窪蹋勛圖厙 has relied on donor support for more than 50 years.

Your donation today will allow us to continue this work on your behalf. Give today at any amount and join the 50,000 members who are building a betterand more civil窪蹋勛圖厙 to live, work, and play.

Related Content
窪蹋勛圖厙s journalism is made possible, in part by funding from Jeffrey Hoffman and Robert Jaeger.